This is How the Medium Algorithm Changed in June

Writers' earnings dropped tremendously, this is the reason…

Image Created by Author using Midjourney

In case you’re still wondering, this is what happened in June on Medium. 

screenshot by author

This post makes a catchy headline “We paid writers more”! Great! Only it’s vs. last year, which is expected, as last year Medium didn’t have the Friend of Medium tier, which is expected to generate more earnings for writers. 

I’m wondering how is it vs. last month, as this is the measure for the positive cashflows. 

My guess: writers earn the same or less. This is mathematically logical, since there’s no other source of income than the membership fees and the major expenses are writer’s earnings. 

How the algorithm changed

Going down in the comments section, we can see three “primary” changes:

• “author incentives”: I can’t think of anything other than writers’ earnings. After all, if writers make less, Medium makes more. 

• “curation”: I read some boost nominators reported a much lower approval rate of nominated stories. I assume this curation also refers to the stories that go for general distribution and the Medium staff picks. 

• “recs”: that goes to the recommendations. Tony explained that made a very big shift in which writers were recommended for read. 

Here’s where my curiosity peaked: Tony suggests there are writers who get recommended more, and others who get recommended less. But almost every writer I read reports less views, reads and earnings. So I’m wondering: 

Who the heck are those writers? And how does this lead to more subscribers??

Then I went down in the comments of this thread. 

screenshot by author

And it hit me!

I rushed back to my recommendations. I checked 10+ stories of writers I don’t follow. 

All of those recommended stories had no link to read for free at the beginning!

Regardless — a friend link, a link to an external blog, or a link to your Substack (as I do)! All of those stories had none! Logically, readers were prompted to pay to continue reading. 

To be honest, enabling non-members to read for free is not working towards Medium’s profitability. And for writers, it’s best if Medium becomes profitable as soon as possible. 

I believe this is the major change in the algorithm in June. 

The reason I read so many writers have drops in earnings is because I only read Friends of Medium and almost all of them start their stories with a link to read for free. 

I’m now going to test how my stories will perform without adding such a link in the beginning. 

---

Just as a reminder, we also saw in June:

• Some counterintuitive changes that serve fewer views and reads for writers.

• Lots of writers getting their enrollment in the MPP revoked.

• Suspended and deleted writers’ accounts. 

All affected writers I know are active daily. 

I can now clearly see how all this leads to cash positive. Unfortunately, this still doesn’t mean profits, so I expect even more changes in the same direction. 

---

So this is how Medium’s algorithm changed in June. 

Thanks for reading!